
Everyone seems to have an opinion about the plant known as Hydrilla. Unknown to many is the fact that this aquatic plant is actually an invasive species. It is well known that fish (especially bass) love hydrilla, but it is something that can easily overwhelm a water system and create problems for boat navigation and even worse; damage to native plant and animal species. Too much of a good thing really is a bad thing.
The great debate has really been heating up in Florida and more specifically on the world famous bass fishing destination known as the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has held a series of public meetings to address the hydrilla epidemic. As they say in a
recent article, everyone is affected and all have their own opinion on what to do with this aquatic invader,
"Not only anglers and waterfowlers, but groups including bird-watchers, lake-front residents, recreational boaters, airboaters and owners of fish camps, tackle shops and marinas each have their own notions regarding how much hydrilla they consider to be ideal for their interests."
No matter which side of the debate, everyone realizes that there needs to be some control with hydrilla. It's not just happening in Florida, hydrilla continues to spread across the country and it grows very fast, you might even say it grows like a weed.
It's not all bad news with hydrilla.
Besides being good fish habitat
"Hydrilla provides food for a non-native variety of apple snails, which first appeared on Lake Toho in 2005 and became the primary food source for snail kites, which came to Lake Toho in 2007. Kites, which are medium-sized hawks, swoop down to capture snails as they breathe and feed near the surface in hydrilla beds.
Welch said it may be the first time in the United States that an endangered species is surviving on an exotic snail that feeds on an exotic plant -- hydrilla"
Even with the benefits from hydrilla, the debate often turned heated at the FWC meetings and they often
"turned contentious, with groups taking the FWC to task and arguing among themselves."
There is no doubt that something needs to be done with hydrilla, but to what level and the best methods are open to debate. The FWC and other state and federal agencies are doing what they can to ensure that everyone is happy and the best interest of the ecosystems are taken into account. A good example of this comes from the
news article when it states that
"FWC is demonstrating a good-faith effort to understand hydrilla's importance to its stakeholders and showing a willingness to leave hydrilla in areas where it does not compete with native plants."